On 2010-12-01 0:33, Boris Liberman wrote:
I have pretty old Philips Brilliance 200W monitor (I think it is 20"
and somewhat wide) that has like 16 ms response time. I still find it
most excellent for photo processing. If they were for sale now, I'd
sure recommend you buy it.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Gonz<[email protected]> wrote:
You guys have any experiences good or bad with any particular brands
of 24" LCD monitors? I'm looking for a good 24" (or larger) monitor
for photo-editing. I looked at Dell's website and found one for a
very good price, but a couple of comments really made it sound like it
was a bad choice. Does 5ms response time (vs 3ms) really make that
much of a difference?
Response time makes /no/ difference for uses like photo editing. It can
sometimes make a difference when viewing videos. It can make a big
difference if you play computer games.
Take a look at TVs of the same size, too. I've found that the TVs can
have better color gamut and brightness than the computer monitors of the
same size.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
