On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Boris Liberman wrote: > Eric, I had a couple non-Pentax tele-converters. One I used as such another > was purely macro converter. Both were only so-so though macro converter > wasn't all that bad. They eat light so that if you mount 200/2.8 on 2x tele > converter, you get equivalent of 400/5.6. If you mount one more 2x converter > you'd be at 800/11.0. > > One of the reasons I decided to cease using tele lenses was that it was an > either-either choice - either mediocre results with cheap gear or gear beyond > my financial reach.
Thanks, Boris. That's helpful. I hear on NPR this morning you've got pretty serious drought there. Sincerely, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA [email protected] -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
