Hi,
I'd like to say some words about the difference between K20D and K-5.
Often I do test cameras head-to-head i.e. I do use both at the same
conditions simultaneously. This time I used the other way and abandoned
my "old trusty" K20D for a three days. Completely. Simply took K-5 and
got used to it. Then returned to K20D and (oh boy) there WAS a
difference. Human mind is strange - it doesn't notice slight (and even
not-so-slight) changes to better side, but if something goes a even bit
worse... In short - K20D now feels noisy, slow and loud. Focusing with
SDM-lenses hunts much more and is clearly slower (16-50, 50-135,
60-250). With screw-driven lenses (FA50/1.4, DA35/2.4, DA40 Limited
etc.) the difference is marginal.
And still, K20D feels more comfortable in my hand than K-5.
BR, Margus
On 12/06/2010 4:05 PM, Miserere wrote:
As part of my on-going K-5 review, I updated the focusing section:
http://enticingthelight.com/2010/12/01/review-pentax-k-5/#focusing
My conclusions about focusing speed seem to differe from everyone
else's. Opinions welcomed!
Cheers,
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
