It could be really hard to know which ones to delete. I certainly would have tossed the original.
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:11 AM, paul stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > I found that highlight correction yields quite a bit more overhead, but I > haven't really needed it. I don't test, but I do shoot a lot. And after > shooting more than 1000 frames with the k-5, I find that I almost never > encounter a histogram that touches the edges of the scale in either > direction, so I have plenty of latitude to work with. > Paul > On Dec 8, 2010, at 5:50 AM, SV Hovland wrote: > >> You could turn on highlight correction. It will probably give you 2 stops of >> highlight overhead and with the low shadow noise on K-5 there is little to >> loose. >> >> Stig Vidar Hovland >> >> >> ________________________________________ >> Fra: [email protected] [[email protected]] på vegne av Miserere >> [[email protected]] >> Sendt: 8. desember 2010 09:33 >> Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Emne: Massaging K-5 RAW files >> >> I was surprised to find out the K-5 only has 1 stop of highlight >> overhead because I thought my K10D had a bit more than that. I'm going >> to have to run that check again. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
