I also have two portraits in the gallery with very clear ad recognizable faces, and I submitted not model releases for them, So, it seems that my image was rejected on the merits. <g>
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=ARTIST&subSection=1309043&subSubSection=10722422&language=EN Dan -- Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Ann Sanfedele <[email protected]> wrote: > paul stenquist wrote: > >> On Dec 26, 2010, at 8:44 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: >>> >>> Steven Desjardins wrote: >>> >>>> It funny of how a PUG wiht "rejected" in the title is so good. No >>>> favs to point out; just consistently good shots. >>>> >>> I'm guessing that Dan's and Dario's were rejected because of lack of >>> model's releases for the clear faces in them. >>> >> >> You don't need model releases for the Pentax gallery or any other online >> gallery. (I have some people pics in the Pentax gallery without releases, >> including one on the opening display.) It's not like stock where you need a >> release, because the intent is to sell the photo for commercial purposes. In >> a gallery, anything goes. No release is just fine. >> Paul>> > Interesting... I thought the Pentax operated Pentax gallery might be > basically one big ad, in a way. Even though no money was changing hands. > > ann > >> >>> >>> Totally shocking that Mark's stunning shot didnt get in - go figure! I'm >>> also awfully fond of Dave Brooks church and Ken's bird... >>> but certainly it is puzzling that these were all rejects. >>> >>> ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
