Personally, I'd like to ponder how a forest of null trees would look in any real way different from just a single null tree.
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:25:51AM +0200, Boris Liberman wrote: > Oh, John, obviously there is a proper explanation of the name, > either the one you gave or some historical one. But remember, I am > essentially Dilbert, so whenever I see "null" I think of null > pointer, not lack of trees. > > Boris > > > > On 12/27/2010 10:19 AM, John Francis wrote: > >On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 08:52:23AM +0200, Boris Liberman wrote: > >>What an odd name for the location - _null_arbor... My immediate > >>reaction - it is a forest of null (binary?!) trees or something... > >>/very curious and somewhat mischievous grin/. > >> > >>Boris > > > >15 seconds spent with Google of Wikipedia would have explained it nicely. > > > >>From the wikipedia entry on Nullarbor: > > > > The word Nullarbor is derived from the Latin nullus, "no", and arbor, > > "tree", > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
