I'm surprised the K7 pic is as sharp as it is, given that it was shot at f13, where you're going to get a lot of diffusion. Try it at f5.6 or so. What stop did you shoot the 6x7 pic at. And what lens. You list an 80/2.8. I assume you mean the 90/2.8?
Paul On Jan 1, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Jens wrote: > Thank you all for you rinterest in responding and answering my question. > I have done some samll tests, that didin't turn out too well. But I was using > old film and a questionable lab for developing. > My result is shown at flickr. > I photographed a sitting girl (in full figure) filling out the frame with my > K-7 and with my 67. I enlarged one eye to be able to evaluate the resolution > and sharpness: > K-7: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/5204650099/in/set-72157625461434140/ > 67: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/5204621235/in/set-72157625461434140/ > > In my small, not too well done ,test it seems that the K-7 is doing rather > well. > In order to convince myself, that I should keep on using the 67 (insted of > selling it) I need results that show, that the 67 delivers reslults that are > superior to those of the K-7. > > Regards > Jens > -- > Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
