Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message -----
From: "J.C. O'Connell" <[email protected]>
Subject: Model Naming Convention
After we get the K-3 and K-1 where will the model numbers go?
K-9 - I hear it will be a dog.
--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:[email protected])
Join the CD PLAYER & DISC Discussions :
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdsound/
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of P.
J. Alling
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 5:36 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: 645D fiddling
Since I'm pretty sure that the Flex board in the K-7 is the same as that
in the 645D, (it would only make sense from a cost perspective), and the
A lenses are supposedly electronically comparable from K mount to 645
mount, Pentax could easily implement such a thing in a future higher
level K body much as Nikon has done with their higher level bodies with
their older lenses. I'd pay a little extra for a K-3 with that
capability. Probably even buy one before a major price drop for it.
On 1/6/2011 5:31 PM, AlunFoto wrote:
2011/1/6 P. J. Alling<[email protected]>:
So we get an aperture simulator for 10,000 bucks?
You got it in one.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
