Hi Butch, I have the M 135/3.5. It's a very nice, compact, high quality, and super affordable lens. Good tonality, haven't had a problem with flare (the built-in hood doesn't look big enough to me, but it seems to do the job all the same). If I replaced mine, it would probably be with something that focused a little closer than the M 135/3.5's 5' limit.
http://pug.komkon.org/01sep/Sky135.html http://pug.komkon.org/01nov/Downtown.html Happy hunting, Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Hi; > >I think I've made up my mind on what to look for. I'm thinking of a 28 3.5 >smcp, 135 3.5 smcp, and a 200 4.0 smcp, all either K's or M's. Anyone who >has had any of those lenses, your feedback would be appreciated. Also, how >similar is the 200 4.0 M to the older 200 4 screwmount super takumar, a >lens which I used and liked for many years with my spotmatic. > >Butch - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
