On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:13 PM, P. J. Alling <[email protected]> wrote: > Editing my own post for clarity. I really should proof read these before I > hit send.
Hum, maybe i should....oh never mind Dave > > On 1/16/2011 10:20 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: >> >> On 1/16/2011 9:50 AM, David J Brooks wrote: >>> >>> http://www.henrys.ca/57376-USED-PENTAX-K1000-SLR-BODY--8-Plus-.aspx >>> This is what the K1000 commands around here. I think its way to high, >>> but...... >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 5:23 AM, eckinator<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> hi gang >>>> >>>> what would be a realistic price for each of these individually? >>>> any input is greatly appreciated >>>> >>>> thanks in advance >>>> ecke >>>> >>>> bodies: >>>> MX - fairly few traces of use as judged by age >> >> Sadly these seem to go for no more than a K1000. Happily due to student >> demand that cab be upwards of $200.00 >> >>>> ME super - medium amount of visible use >> >> You might get $50-60 for it. >> >>>> MX - much visible use but fully functional >> >> Half to three quarters of the Better one. If it's functional. Most >> people judge by looks. >> >>>> K1000 - used very little >> >> Probably $200 plus in a College town. >> >>>> lenses: >>>> smc-m 50/2 - slight wear, no dings or scratches >> >> $20 or throw it in with one of the bodies. >> >>>> panagor automacro converter - next to no visible use >> >> No clue but not much probably.$20.00. >> >>>> tokina rmc 25-50/4 - good shape, little wear >> >> I really have no idea on this one. But I doubt it would fetch much more >> than $100, and I'm only guessing that because it's a fixed aperture and a >> fairly wide minimum focal length. >> >>>> komura teleconverter Telemore 95 II - hardly used >> >> I assume K mount, I've never seen one in K. This was a much sought after >> teleconverter, having a very good reputation for producing good images when >> coupled with a good lens. They were very expensive when new. Now I doubt >> you'll get much more than you would for some cheap crap TC, at most $20-30. >> I'd try for if I were the seller, but I'd be really happy if I were the >> buyer. > > That should be "I'd try for more if I were the seller." > >> >>>> ebc fujinon t 135/2.5 with m42 adaptor >> >> Those Fuji lenses are supposed to be very good but screw mounts are a dime >> a dozen.so Id expect maybe $50 bucks, and that's > > Should be: "...that's with the adapter which would be worth about $20." > >> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>>> follow the directions. >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
