same here. but I know that it is probably used for every single cover photo of my tv guide - these people look like never so much as a pore had ever disgraced their faces, let alone any character or even charisma
2011/1/17 Steven Desjardins <[email protected]>: > We've actually talked about this. I personally dislike that extreme > level of "plastic" skin". I much prefer the middle image as a touched > up final version. > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:53 AM, eckinator <[email protected]> wrote: >> had never even heard of it. looks like it could be useful for those >> producing portraiture for an advertising or personal gift context. not >> my cup of tea though, I prefer deep wrinkles ;] >> cheers >> Ecke >> >> 2011/1/17 Jens <[email protected]>: >>> Anyone here using Portrait Professional? >>> This is software, that's affordable, easy to use and quite impressive, >>> actually. >>> I guess it's not "Come il fout" or PC these days. Nevertheless software >>> like this may be quite commonly used, although rarely spoken of :-) >>> >>> Regards >>> Jens >>> >>> -- >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >>> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > > > -- > Steve Desjardins > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
