On 27 January 2011 19:46, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 27, 2011, at 7:14 PM, David J Brooks wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Rob Studdert <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On 28 January 2011 10:39, Cotty <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Looks like a crop of dodgy sensors afflicting some K5's - I presume this >>>> is the 'dust' syndrome I have read about? >>>> >>>> <http://www.dpreview.com/news/1101/11012706pentaxk5service.asp> >>> >>> Well that's positive news, no obfuscation or dismissal in this case. >> >> Kinda like the AF board problems on the D2H that Nikon said was not a >> concern, then turned around and offered free replacements to out for >> warranty cameras. Mine was still in warranty.:-) >> > As far as I know, Pentax never said there wasn't a problem. > Paul
In fact, they admitted there *was* a problem back in December: http://enticingthelight.com/2010/12/01/review-pentax-k-5/#stains —M. \/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com http://EnticingTheLight.com A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
