On Feb 14, 2011, at 1:11 PM, John Francis wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:30:04PM -0800, Larry Colen wrote: >> Here's one that I like from last night's figure photos. >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5446208938/in/set-72157625920855489/ >> >> I think it works best in B&W, though here is the color version >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/5444787692/in/set-72157625920855489/ >> >> All of the skin shown in this one is publicly acceptable, but depending upon >> your flickr settings, not all of the photos in the rest of set are safe for >> work. > > Flickr wants you to log in to see the images, anyway. > That's complicated if you don't have a Flickr account.
Yeah, despite flickr's massive suckage, it's some of the cheapest, convenient offsite storage that doesn't trash the bandwidth to my home server. However, because they're such prudes, I mark anything that shows boobage as at least "moderate" if not "restricted" and you have to be a member of flickr (or yahoo), and tell them that you don't get offended by "adult themed" photos to see them. Doesn't it make you feel safer to know that you're so well protected from such harmful images? I think that I've fixed the permissions. It didn't want to make them visible to public search or something. I had to set up a special set of just the "art photos" and open up the permissions, safety, and search settings of those: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157626050853922/ And they seem to be opened up in the original sets. As I said, don't you feel so much safer? > -- Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
