The man's right.
I think that this whole issue stems from the more general concept. Often
we would confuse our personal perception of something with its general
counterpart. As a consequence, we would project our own perception and,
in this very case, call an image "true to life" whereas the notion of
what is "true" is different for every single one of us. But without
noticing that "true to life" of mine may be different from that of
another person, I would engage myself in a heated debate with them,
although in many cases such a debate would be pointless from the beginning.
To that end, I can only recall once in a lifetime (so far) experience of
visiting a photo exhibition in Chicago with fellow PDMLers. That was a
blast in many aspects, including that of being able to actually talk
with someone about what I saw knowing that they are a kindred spirit
that would most likely understand me better.
Boris
On 2/16/2011 10:34 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Good article: http://www.bhinsights.com/content/myth-unmanipulated-image.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
