Thanks - I'll look for it.
I am joining a Whitefish Point Bird Observatory sponsored birding trip in the 
Sault Ste. Marie neighborhood this weekend. AFIK, the other 15 on the trip are 
birders (who may also take photographs) rather than photographers (who enjoy 
shooting birds). It will be interesting to see how the cultures mesh. Weather 
is predicted to be cold, 50% snow, wind gusts to 35 mph . . . should be 
invigorating!

stan

On Feb 16, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Ken Waller wrote:

> For those interested in the birds of Michigan (Paul, Stan, Bill & maybe 
> others) I found a great little book - Birds of Michigan by Stan Tekiela. It's 
> devided by colors with a page on each including relevant info.
> 
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christian" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Bird Books (was: Re: Unknown..)
> 
> 
>> I used to be a big fan of Peterson's but I find Sibley's better since it has 
>> more varieties of each species.  Book with photographs are almost impossible 
>> to use; drawings/paintings are much better for identification.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Christian
>> http://404mohawknotfound.blogspot.com
>> http://birdofthemoment.blogspot.com
>> 
>> On 2/14/2011 2:26 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
>>> Very nice capture Jack. I am envious.
>>> You don't need a bird book, you need a hawk book. You'll then find many 
>>> more detailed images of all (?) of the various North American hawks and 
>>> related beasties. And, if like me, you'll still not be able to tell them 
>>> apart. But at least you'll have a Hawk Book!
>>> 
>>> (I am on the road, in a couple of days will give you a specific reference 
>>> to such a book if you like.)
>>> 
>>> stan
>>> 
>>> On Feb 14, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I didn't "invest" in a bird book, but I have one I was given. Although 
>>>> fairly thick with many, may nice slick images, finding the needed angle 
>>>> for identification is still problematic.
>>>> Since posting I've been advised, in rather positive terms, that it's a 
>>>> young Red Tail.
>>>> Thanks for commenting, Ken!
>>>> 
>>>> Jack
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --- On Mon, 2/14/11, Ken Waller<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> From: Ken Waller<[email protected]>
>>>>> Subject: Re: Unknown..
>>>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"<[email protected]>
>>>>> Date: Monday, February 14, 2011, 9:06 AM
>>>>> Nice catch.
>>>>> 
>>>>> It's possibly a Broad-winged Hawk (Buteo platypterus).
>>>>> 
>>>>> Looks like its time for you to invest in a bird book.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kenneth Waller
>>>>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Jack Davis"<[email protected]>
>>>>> Subject: PESO: Unknown..
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> ..Hawk. Bird book no help. Anyone? Was a bit closer to
>>>>> this one. Maybe
>>>>>> about 30 ft.(?) Close to ideal light angle.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Nough hawks for now!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Jack
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Comments?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=572
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> K20, DA55~300@300mm, f/8, 1/1500, ISO 400
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to