On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 23:00 +0200, "Bulent Celasun" <[email protected]> wrote: > Darren, Bob, Brian, Jostein, > > Thank you all very much for your extensive and informative replies. > > I think Jostein's below comment explains why SilkyPix developer > produces a better looking output: > >>It might be that SilkyPix' understanding of proprietary data gives it an > >>edge in the processing. > > I use LightZone and still like it very much. However, > in spite of my attempts at slight exposure compensation (using K20D) > to expose to the right, > LightZone displays the default images as 1/2 stops or more underexposed. > They simply look lifeless at first sight. > The same pef files look different (properly exposed) under SilkyPix. > > I guess I can make it sing somewhat like SilkyPix by tweaking its tools. > Its "styles" can work more or less like "presets". >
I tried LightZone a couple of years ago but I could never get my head around its zone system of exposure correction. Cheers Brian ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- -- http://www.fastmail.fm - IMAP accessible web-mail -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
