Thanks Brian - was guided by your email of 4/3, which said that an image had to fit in an 800x800 box. It might be worth clarifying that portrait images cannot be taller than 533 pixels or will need resizing for the gallery? I certainly don't want to cause you additional work when putting the gallery together!
John -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Walters Sent: Monday, 7 March 2011 12:57 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: RE: March PUG is up! Hi John On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:59 +1000, "John Coyle" <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm surprised at that Brian - the image was 800x534 - does that one > pixel make all the difference? > No - your submission was a portrait format image and it's the vertical 800 pixel dimension that determines whether an image is displayed at a reduced size. In the gallery, your image displays at about 356 x 533, but the full sized image is displayed when you click on the gallery image (although, because the gallery limit was 720 pixels on the longest side, I had to resize your image (and several others) to fit within that limit, so the 'full size' imaged displayed is actually 481 x 720 rather than 534 x 800). I'm not sure I'm explaining that well - does it make any sense? Cheers Brian ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- -- http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
