On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Bob.
> But my math sucks. It was 35 years ago -- 1976. Hardly seems possible.
> Paul

Great adjustment and a nice story. Good picture to.

Dave
> On Mar 17, 2011, at 4:35 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
>
>> Paul,
>> Wow, that brings back some memories.
>> Yes your scanner is soft, but the photo is a great promo piece.
>> I love the flames visible on the far side of the hood.
>> Regards,  Bob S.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Paul Stenquist <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> Twenty-five years ago, I had an idea. I had been shooting cars for Super 
>>> Stock Magazine for a year or two. The Chi-Town Hustler crew had just built 
>>> a new funny car, and I was going to shoot it for the mag. While I would 
>>> shoot plenty of pics in a safe and nicely lit parking lot, I wanted to try 
>>> to get one pic with the Chicago skyline in the background. And I wanted the 
>>> engine running and flames coming out of the editors. Well, I talked the 
>>> guys into dragging the car down to the peninsula on which the Chicago 
>>> Planetarium is built, and unloaded it on the sidewalk. Unfortunately, I had 
>>> forgotten about the streetlights, and had no idea what color temp they 
>>> were. (Turns out they were close to fluorescent green, only greener.) I 
>>> brought my two strobes and plenty of wiring. I had a fairly powerful 
>>> Honeywell potato masher, and I set that up to light the side of the car. I 
>>> used a small Rollei flash and mounted it closer to illuminate the front of 
>>> the car. I shot Ektachrome 120 in a Mamiyaflex C2, and bracketed from f11 
>>> at 1/30th, all the way to f4 at 1/15th. (Didn't own a flash meter at the 
>>> time.) Well, I pretty much overestimated the power of those flashes outside 
>>> at night, and the only good exposures were at f4. But the green cast from 
>>> the street lights was awful at the longer exposures, and shorter exposures 
>>> were underexposed. So my best shots were almost decent exposures but 
>>> lacking DOF and way too green. In those days, they couldn't be fixed.
>>>
>>> This morning I had a go at fixing one of them in PhotoShop. Unfortunately, 
>>> my scanner sucks (a flatbed Epson 3200), so the shot that was probably soft 
>>> to begin with is softer yet. But I did fix the color and exposure. It's now 
>>> almost what I had in mind a quarter century ago. The Chi-Town guys will get 
>>> a kick out of it.
>>>
>>> BTW, Pat Minick, who is sitting in the car in the pic, offered to shoot out 
>>> the street lights with his sidearm that night. I declined, figuring I 
>>> needed the light, even if it was green.
>>>
>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=12827153&size=lg
>>>
>>> Paul
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>



-- 
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to