On Wednesday, February 20, 2002, at 09:38 AM, P�l Audun Jensen wrote: > > The camera in itself isn't that bad. I mean, a fully loaded EOS-1 and > F5 weight about the same, but they are also monsters. It's when you > start to add lenses that the whole thing becomes simply too much (for > me). When (or if) I buy a 67 system I'll stick with two lenses only; > the 75/2.8 and the 45/4. Telephotos stops making sense (to me) in the > 67 system, particularly when I also own the 645. The 645 system is the > best MF system out there for telephoto work.
I heartily agree about telephotos. I don't have any for my 67, and I'm not really considering anything past the 300mm (which is a pretty short telephoto). If I were primarily shooting with longer lenses, I'd probably either still be all 35mm or I'd have bought a Pentax 645/645n. I tend to travel light, even with my 35mm gear. -Aaron - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
