I had the original 14-42 and never liked it.  Part of my problem was
an adaptor and the Zuiko 50 2.0 macro which was just so much sharper.
I'm curious to be using the 45-200 off the LCD.  I'll let you know.

On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Walter Hamler <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Steven.  I bought the camera when they had the two lens kit on
> special. I can't believe how sharp it has turned out to be. The 14~42
> is equally as sharp and it seems to be half the weight of the older
> design. Now that I have the EV-2 finder it truly is a delightful combo
> to carry around.
>
> Walt
>
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Steven Desjardins <[email protected]> wrote:
>> very nice.  I thought hard about that lens but decided to go for the
>> Lumix 45-200.  You know how it is: You do research with reviews and
>> m43 forums, find a used one for $200, order it, and then spend the
>> next week with examples of how wonderful the other lens was.
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Walter Hamler <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> http://walthamler.smugmug.com/Photography/Micro-Four-Thirds-Gallery/16211247_u3uwa#1222729669_Fn8z8-O-LB
>>>
>>> This was with the E-PL2 and the 40~150 lens at 150 (300 equivalent)
>>> This is a 100% crop with slight sharpening only.
>>> I have a small 80mm telescope that is extremely sharp but need to get
>>> an adapter to attach the camera to it.
>>> For those familiar with the Micro Four Thirds cameras and adapters, do
>>> they make on that has female T-adapter threads? They are very close to
>>> M-42 but a slightly different pitch.
>>>
>>> Walt
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 2:40 PM, P. J. Alling
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> My poor attempt at photographing last night's "Super Moon".
>>>>
>>>> It seems that the sharpest long lens combination I have that will mount on
>>>> the K20D is the A*300 f4.0 with the F 1.7x AF converter, and even that was
>>>> not as sharp at infinity as I find it to be at closer distances.  This 
>>>> image
>>>> is cropped from the center portion (about 1000 pixels square), of the K20D
>>>> frame.
>>>>
>>>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20supermoon.html
>>>>
>>>> Equipment: K20D w/smc Pentax A*300mm f4.0 and smc Pentax F 1.7x AF
>>>> converter.
>>>>
>>>> As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Where's the Kaboom?  There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!
>>>>
>>>>        --Marvin the Martian.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>>> follow the directions.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Steve Desjardins
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.



-- 
Steve Desjardins

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to