On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:11 AM, mike wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would argue that there isn't a 300mm made that is hand holdable, if you > want to take decent pictures. These are all DA*300/4 hand-held. And I would consider myself handicapped a bit by shooting a K10D, which I like to keep at quite low ISO settings. 2 more stops would be a nice improvement in DOF and/or motion blur. http://www.flickr.com/photos/coneslayer/2917327644/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/coneslayer/2923337146/ (with Tamron 1.4x TC) http://www.flickr.com/photos/coneslayer/2923372150/ (with Tamron 1.4x TC) http://www.flickr.com/photos/coneslayer/2883706548/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/coneslayer/3707902187/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/coneslayer/3705394337/ (By incandescent bathroom lighting) Tamron 70-300 at 300mm: http://www.flickr.com/photos/coneslayer/2525886350/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
