This may be a silly suggestion but have you tried cleaning the lens with good old Kodak Lens Cleaning fluid and paper? I bought a lens described as having cleaning marks which disappeared after a good cleaning.
At 11:36 AM 2/21/2002 -0500, you wrote: >On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 10:30:51PM -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > "Cleaning marks?" Isn't that a euphemism for scratches? > > > >of course :) I didnt know about them before i got it either. But it >seemed to perform just fine and for a decent price. > > > Nitin Garg wrote: > > > > > I am quite happy with what i sold it for. I have a super-tak 35/3.5 and > > > 105/2.8 (cleaning marks on it tho!) > > -- > > Shel Belinkoff > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/ > > You can't have everything. Where would you put it? > > - > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . >- >This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, >go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to >visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
