I like that more. The push to an abstractive collection of shapes, tones and textures removes it further from my eye trying to "make sense" of it as representational and trying to orient it "correctly".
Good stuff! On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Boris Liberman <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/9/2011 18:06, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >> >> The comment relating to Man Ray, however, gave me the thought that if >> you pushed it just a little further into the graphic arts domain, it >> would work in the same way that many of the surrealist/Dada photograms >> and other such works do. The lines and forms are there, they simply >> need to be abstracted away so that the eye doesn't relate to them as >> representational to any normal perspective. > > Following yours and others suggestions here is the second version: > > http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2011/04/peso-081-have-sit.html > > I wonder if I understood your correctly, guys, and processed it in the right > direction. > > Boris > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
