Yikes. That's as bad as I've seen from that site. Pixel peeping or not, that kind of rep is going to be a problem.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Jaume Lahuerta <jlah...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Since I was interested in the new 18-135 zoom, and more after having seen in > person how (relatively) compact is, I was impatiently awaiting the Photozone > test. Some preliminary comments were not very promising and the final test has > confirmed the worst predictions: > http://www.photozone.de/pentax/597-pentax_18135_3556?start=2 > > As a summary, I just copy a couple of notes placed at the end of the test: > > "Just to mention again - we couldn't believe the rather poor performance so > we > asked the local Pentax service in Hamburg/Germany for an assessment of the > situation. Result: the lens is within factory specifications." > > "After the friction this has caused in the community I will request a > statement > from Pentax once again why they think that this is a valid sample." > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
