Thanks for posting, Dave. The print quality at various ISOs near the end
was interesting--I actually wrote the findings down:
ISOs
80--good up to 20 x 30
100-400--good with slight loss of detail at 20x30
800--some loss of detail at 20x30 but ok at arms length
1600--some loss of detail at 20x30 but ok at arms length
3200--ok at 16x24 but better at 13x19
6400--usable at 13x19 but better at 11 x 14
12,800--too noisy for 11x14, but acceptable at 8x10
25,600--soft and sloppy at 8x10 but pretty good at 5x7
51,200--prints well at 4x6
This is amazing to me. Think of the possibilities! Cheers, Christine
----- Original Message -----
From: "David J Brooks" <[email protected]>
To: "Pentax Discuss" <[email protected]>; "Barbara Brooks" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 10:30 AM
Subject: Pentax Face Book site claims.............
..............that the k-5 is the most read review on
imaging-resources web site. I had a look, its a very long review but
seems well writtewn.
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/K5/K5A.HTM
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
