I wasn't doing a direct comparison however from what I remember I was favorably impressed with the Nikon view finder thinking it was more like an MX/ME or LX viewfinder rather than the ZX-M finder. Then again as I said you're paying 4X as much for the Nikon over the ZX-M.
At 09:07 AM 2/24/2002 +0100, you wrote: >I�d say that you exaggerate a bit. I have looked through its viewfinder - >admittedly it was long ago - but it looked OK. And it did get very >positive reviews when it was introduced. I haven�t seen the Nikon, though. >All the best! >Raimo >Personal photography homepage at >http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen > >-----Alkuper�inen viesti----- >L�hett�j�: Alan Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >P�iv�: 24. helmikuuta 2002 0:39 >Aihe: Re: Vs: Vs: Camera for Limited lenses > > > >>Yeah - but MZ-M get�s the same things done. > > > >Certainly not. A manual focus camera without a sharp viewfinder is no > camera > >at all. It's an insult. > > > >regards, > >Alan Chan > > > > > >_________________________________________________________________ > >Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > >- > >This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > >go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > >visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . >- >This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, >go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to >visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
