My information is strictly unofficial, word of mouth. I do know that it's less grainy yet has more apparent sharpness than it did when I first used it in the late sixties. In any case, I would expect the changes to be beneficial. Even a new base might affect development times, but I would think the overall characteristics of the film would be either slightly improved or unchanged. I guess we'll have to wait and see. Paul
Shel Belinkoff wrote: > I think your numbers are a bit high. Can you tell me about when it's > been improved, and what the changes were. Three is the number that > comes up most frequently. I've tried to find a history about the film, > but have had no luck. It seems like you've got some more information. > > Paul Stenquist wrote: > > > > Tri-X has been modified at least a half dozen times in the last two dozen > > years. Once more shouldn't be a problem. > > -- > Shel Belinkoff > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/ > You can't have everything. Where would you put it? > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
