Which seems odd to me, in the days of film, Pentax was more a Lens
manufacture than a camera maker. Really after the M series, (with the
notable exception of the LX, and minor exceptions of the PZ-1 and Super
Program), until the MZ-S was introduced, all Pentax camera bodies seemed
to me to be second rate, (no matter how much I like the ZX-5n/MZ-3),
almost an after thought so that you could actually use a Pentax Camera
with your fine Pentax lenses. I'd think the PPG would allow 3rd party
film camera bodies and /require/ Pentax Lenses, because that's the whole
reason to buy Pentax.
On 7/5/2011 6:29 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 09:30 +0100, "Paul Dunderdale"<[email protected]>
wrote:
Could be a Pentax lens on a non-Pentax body?
According to the 'rules', that's not allowable. The body must be Pentax.
When you add data to your images, you can choose "Other" for non-Pentax
lenses, but there is no equivalent field for bodies.
Cheers
Brian
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
P
On 5 Jul 2011, at 06:24, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Well the voting system seems to be fine now, and all the photos in my area are
mine... but as I've been voting I've noticed there are several
photos coming up with "NULL" in the camera body column. anyone have an idea
what that is about?
ann
--
Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!
--Marvin the Martian.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
