This one is more to the point:

http://www.digitalversus.com/guide-diffraction-camera-sensors-article-1017.html

(Yes, I have better things to do but I'm waiting for my student to get
back from lunch so she can practice her talk.)

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Steven Desjardins <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here's what I found:
>
> "Typically the sensor size is 1/5.5 that of 35mm film, thus the limit
> for the onset of visible diffraction limit for  12 megapixels is
> f/2.4. Since only one small-sensor camera currently has a lens that
> fast, this means that small cameras are always diffraction limited and
> that megapixel counts much above about 12—which is currently
> offered—are almost pointless. This observation explains why typical
> small cameras do not even allow f-stops smaller than f/8: at f/8 the
> onset-of-diffraction limit is 450 lines, corresponding to about 1.5
> megapixels.
>
> The author has also observed this effect: pictures taken at f/8 are
> visibly, disappointingly less sharp than those taken at wider
> apertures. I have started using a pocket camera with manual override
> to assure that I use apertures wider than about f/5, and preferable
> much wider, whenever possible."
>
> The site is: 
> http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/article_pages/guest/physical_limits.html
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Steven Desjardins <[email protected]> wrote:
>> It's an interesting point.  Mu43 lenses hit their sweet spot around f4
>> and diffraction effects are rearing their head above f8. I may go
>> agoogling about this.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:21 PM, P. J. Alling
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> It's a recording device.  If he lenses are good then everything in you photo
>>> will be sharp, no distracting out of focus areas.  Now you can take this
>>> with a grain of salt, because it's quite likely I did the math wrong but the
>>> f 1.9 Standard (8mm), lens would have the same lens opening diameter, wide
>>> open as a 35mm lens would have at f ~147.  Not to mention that the 35mm lens
>>> on an APS-C sized sensor, (or film for that matter), would be suffering from
>>> serious diffraction effects.  I don't see how diffraction isn't a major
>>> problem for the Q camera system.
>>>
>>> On 7/19/2011 7:50 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It's overpriced of course, but I actually think it could be a very
>>>> creative tool.  That K7 and all its wonders are often sitting in the
>>>> bag at home.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Christine Aguila<[email protected]>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Neato!  Thanks for posting, Godfrey!  Cheers, Christine
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Godfrey
>>>>> DiGiorgi"<[email protected]>
>>>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"<[email protected]>
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 9:58 PM
>>>>> Subject: Pentax Q photos
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/n00bs/5943610162/in/set-72157627083831739/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And there's a K1 in the set...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Godfrey
>>>>>>  godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>>>>> follow the directions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>>>> follow the directions.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Where's the Kaboom?  There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!
>>>
>>>        --Marvin the Martian.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>> follow the directions.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Steve Desjardins
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Steve Desjardins
>



-- 
Steve Desjardins

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to