Ooops answering myself ---
I thought it was JAck that said what Godders said..
I got the joke of the reference, I like the geometry but that fact that
the girl is in soft focus detracts from it, actually...
If everything were in sharp focus and in BW it would work I think..
My first reaction was that it looked like the girl really wasnt focused
on the tree ... but a bit past it. and if you feel her being out of
focus contributes to the story then I think she nees to be blurred out more.
blah blah blah I just woke up... and it should be "of' KIlmer's not "if"
be back after coffee
ann
On 7/29/2011 10:59, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 7/29/2011 03:26, P. J. Alling wrote:
I focused on the tree, not the girl, and she's focused on the tree. The
fact that I have to explain it probably means it didn't work
There there P.J. I got it, I got it - maybe Jack is one of the lucky
ones who never had to read that nausea producing verse if Kilmer's
ann
.
On 7/29/2011 2:02 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Not sure what you were driving at in this one. Can you explain further?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:38 PM, P. J. Alling
<[email protected]> wrote:
An experiment, I'm not sure if it succeeds, but I'll bet I'll be told.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20athingaslovelyasatree.html
Equipment: Pentax K20D w/smc Pentax F 70-210mm f4.0~5.6
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
--
Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering
Kaboom!
--Marvin the Martian.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
