I believe I paid $700 or so for my 16-50, and maybe $100 more for the 50-135
The K-5, BTW, can now be found for less than $1327; $1230 is the best I've seen On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 01:23:26PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote: > > I'm surprised at how expensive the 16-50 is now. I believe it used to be > about half that price. > Paul > On Jul 29, 2011, at 12:59 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: > > > The K5 is obvious for $1327. The DA* 16-50 is less obvious for $1500. > > The K5 leaves me about 650-700 for a lens. > > > >>> On 7/29/2011 11:21, Steven Desjardins wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I have a firend who wants a camera to take pituctrues of a marching > >>>> band at night from the field. So we need high iso, espceially sicne > >>>> the Tv needs ot be reasoanble. Further, he needs to get about > >>>> 60-80yards in the picutre from the sidelines. He can spend up to > >>>> $2000 and needs a body and lens(es). Suggestions? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
