PJ works under very strict protocols regarding editing pictures. They make sure that they don't tolerate any appearance of misconduct and when it is found, they react like they do as a message to others.
Basic corrections are already allowed, contrast, levels, etc. You cannot materially change the picture via editing. On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Bruce Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11-07-29 3:34 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: >> >> http://www.fourandsix.com/photo-tampering-history/ >> > > It seems that when the pendulum swings, it goes right on through the wall. > The largely politically motivated tampering to deceive is unarguably bad > (unarguable by *us* anyway), but that 2011 item about the photog who merely > removed his shadow from a soccer shot, and then was fired and had all his > stock shots removed -- holy crap almighty! I call that a way over the top > excessive response. > > Next, will photogs be castigated when it's discovered that their cameras > have done hot pixel removal and replaced a truthful (though 100% white) > pixel with a new lying pond-scum average of the surrounding pixels? > > -bmw > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- David Parsons Photography http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com Aloha Photographer Photoblog http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
