You can do fine with mirrorless systems if you like the long end.
Since micro43 has a 2X crop factor relative to 35 mm, there are many
nice lenses above the 70 mm FOV.  If you are willing to manually
focus, a whole new world opens up since there are adaptor for nearly
any brand of lens.  KEH takes on a  whole new appearance.  At the wide
end it's trickier since the new Oly 12 is a big deal.

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:02 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe I ought to consider a completely different  system, not DSLR. Except
> I tend to like lenses of 70mm and above.
>
> But as  I get even older I find I like lighter weights.
>
> Marnie aka Doe :-)   I think I got a WHOLE lot of research to do.
>
>
> In a message dated  8/23/2011 3:09:06 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> [email protected] writes:
>
> On  Aug 23, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
>
>> This is  fun:
>>
>>  http://photorumors.com/2011/08/22/fujifilm-x10-in-the-next-few-weeks/
>>
>> Super compacts seem to be the big wave right now.  Maybe DSLRs  have
>> hit a bit of a wall?
>
> It's a wall called physics.
>
> Allow my to channel Miserere, Godfrey et. al. for a moment.
>
> With  an SLR system, you're limited at the wide end by registration
> distance,  especially with a 35mm derived sensor.  You can get some 
> improvement on
> that score by making Cotty eat his hat, but those sensors cost a LOT  more.
>
> On the other hand, sensor technology is improving so much that you  can get
> reasonable performance from smaller and smaller sensors, which means  less
> costly glass, less costly sensors, and smaller, more convenient  cameras.
> Also, most people benefit from shorter lenses and more depth of  field,
> they're more interested in making sure that their subject is sharp, than  that
> everything else is out of focus.  It's also probably easier to do  autofocus
> quickly if there is more room for error.  There is also the  advantage of
> being able to tune the glass, sensor, registration distance to the  exact
> application, rather than trying to make it fit a general compromise like  an 
> SLR
> mount.
>
> Or, if I weren't so pedantic and loquacious, I'd say  something like:
>
> Well, duh!  Smaller sensors and no mirror works  better for almost everyone
> that either hasn't invested in a lot of DSLR format  lenses.
>
>
>> --
>> Steve Desjardins
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>>  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the  PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the  directions.
>
> --
> Larry Colen [email protected] sent from  i4est
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail  List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to  UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the  directions.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>



-- 
Steve Desjardins

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to