I do remember the K10D/20D reviews. I still think the K5 was a real breakthrough in the opinions about Pentax, maybe because it actually bettered other cameras.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:54 PM, P. J. Alling <[email protected]> wrote: > You should go back and read the reviews of the K20D, (and K10D for that > matter). > > Steven Desjardins wrote: >> >> You and me both. It's the classic example of modern product >> development. The K7 is a great camera at iso 1600 and below, but >> expectations change so quickly. The most interesting thing about the >> K5 is that is really was the first DSLR that was viewed as really >> competitive with it's peers from Canon and Nikon. >> >> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Rick Womer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> --- On Thu, 9/1/11, Steven Desjardins <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>> That's a great shot. >>>> >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>>> >>>> And you >>>> did it with a K7. That's almost like >>>> using a sketch pad. >>>> >>> >>> Yup. Completely obsolete, inadequate, toy-quality junk. I'm ashamed to >>> use it. You may send me my K5 to relieve my pain any time. >>> >>> Rick >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
