thanks, Bruce
Yeah - it isn't my kind of thing but I never saw it before...
It reminds me of photos taken at night with a strobe or flash to
get the foreground in... No objection to the frothy falls.. it is just
all a bit too busy for me. But I liked your "essay" on subjectiveness
bruce:-)
ann
On 9/6/2011 16:12, Bruce Walker wrote:
Ann, it's from this message:
Message-ID:<CAMvv+Hf4aPywf9R_6R0EK4=jnzf8e3n1czxfg7jsbfet+5q...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: OT PESO - Lightpainting
From: David Savage<[email protected]>
G'day All,
Something a bit different:
<http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6081/6095367795_cc173f8bb5_o.jpg
D700, AF-S 14-24mm @ 14mm. 100 seconds @ f8, ISO 400.
Illumination provided by my mini Maglite.
Enjoy.
DS
On 11-09-06 3:28 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I said I wasnt going to be here but
Bipin - where is the photo you are referring to?
since someone apparently thought I commented on it I better find out eh?
LUrking is hard --
I want to jump in but shouldn't - not enough time
ann
On 9/6/2011 09:15, Bipin Gupta wrote:
A technically great HDR type shot. Truly a bit different& appreciated.
But may I add some comments? Please do take it constructively.
Flowing water should look like flowing water, the way nature meant it
to be. It should not be made to look like gas tumbling down instead of
water.
Of late I have seen too many good waterfall photos overdone to look
quite artificial.
Bipin.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
