On 11 September 2011 06:27, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> It's an interesting opinion being that no Micro-FourThirds cameras
> were ever made with the 10Mpixel sensor, all were the 12.3Mpixel
> sensor.
>

Actually, that was my point as well.  I wrote,
" They didn't make that mistake a second time, the m43 EPs and EPLs
(Electronic Pens) were
never saddled with the 10MP sensor, and have been good sellers and performers."


> I hear lots of statements about "the terrible Panasonic noise at high
> ISOs", yet I've been shooting with Panasonic sensor cameras since 2007
> at ISO settings up to 6400 and no one has ever said anything about
> there being "terrible high ISO noise" in my photos. Even when
> exhibiting them against images made with the supposedly far-better
> Sony sensors.
> --

I couldn't find a camera with the 10MP Panasonic sensor that could
reach iso6400.  Olympus 410 and above, 510 and above and the Panasonic
DMC-L10 all top out at iso1600.  The Olympus E-3 tops out at iso3200,
but its sensor is quoted as being 10.1MP and I can't verify that it's
the same unit as the 10MP sensor.

I have an Olympus E-410 that has the 10MP sensor.  It seems passable
at iso800, and I don't mind graininess/noise, but at 1600 it's not
only very noisy but showing shadow banding, especially in artificial
lighting.  Daylight performance seems free of banding so it must be a
problem of blue channel underexposure getting boosted to restore
colour balance.  The E-3 was a 3 to 4 times costlier camera with a
more sophisticated processor, which explains a lot.  But a quick look
at its dpreview review, and a look at comparison samples, shows that
it's the noisiest at high ISOs of all its contemporary peers, and as
noisy at iso1600 as a Nikon D300 at iso6400.

regards, Anthony

   "Of what use is lens and light
    to those who lack in mind and sight"
                                               (Anon)

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to