[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> > Anyone heard of plans for a film scanner using this chip yet?
> > That scanner will have similar advantages.
> 
> Can a scanner be built more cheaply making three passes?  Same
> advantages except for speed.

 I remember the old 3-pass flatbed scanner we had at university.  Had 
three separate lamps.  It was fun watching the thing do its work.

> You _can_ design a monitor like that.  It's called a "beam
> penetration monitor" (and was the first thing I thought of
> when I read about the new sensor).  They were mostly used
> in colour _vector_ displays.
[etc]

 There's another kind of screen I read about a few years back.  It 
was based on a dirt-cheap black & white CRT display, with a fancy 
three-layer LCD-based filter in front of it.  The screen would first 
activate the "red" filter and draw the "red" pixels, then cycle 
through "green" and "blue".  Of course, it had to run at three times 
the scan rate of a colour CRT just to keep up.  It was used in an 
oscilloscope but I'm not sure who made it.  May have been Tektronix.  
I presume it was just too expensive to scale, in addition to the 
problems imposed by raising the refresh rate.

> PS:  One thing I've been wishing for for a long time is a
> dual-trace/dual-colour beam-penetration oscilliscope.  But maybe
> they can digitally reproduce signals on a raster display now?  I
> haven't looked at recent developments in 'scopes for a while.
> No budget for even a used one right now.

 Digital scopes with raster displays have been around for ages.  Even 
with a colour screen if your pocket is deep enough.  HP have even 
released a scope with voice recognition and an inbuilt hard drive.  
Personally I love the Tektronix colour DPO screens.

 What I want in a scope is channels which are isolated from each 
other, and independent timebases for each channel.

> But I'm a "programmer with a soldering iron", so this really
> isn't my field.)

 I'm the exact opposite.  I'm an electrical engineer who dabbles in 
programming.  And my code "hoovers", mainly because I don't define my 
specfications before I start dabbling on a project... much like 
breadboarding a circuit :)

Cheers,
- Dave

http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ (out of date)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to