> I would suggest that since we see in color, it is color that has a
> tendency to be blas? (one reason that people are still drawn to
> photographing sunsets, flowers and other extraordinarily colorful
> subjects).
>
> I would argue that part of the aesthetic appeal of Black & White (or
> other monochromes) is precisely because we DON'T see that way. It
> gives us an alternative view of the world that we don't get
> ordinarily.
>
> Certainly it is in the "different strokes for different folks" arena,
> but I could not disagree more that "B&W is boring" (although I would
> agree that poorly done B&W is not exciting simply because it is in
> B&W).
>
> Darren Addy
> Kearney, Nebraska

> >From the book "Ansel in Color"
> Adams felt closest to black and white photography, which can be
> manipulated to produce a wide range of bold, expressive tones, and he
> felt constricted by the rigidity of the color process. "Art implies
> control of reality, for reality itself possesses no sense of the
> esthetic. Photography becomes an art when certain controls are
> applied..."
>
> In a 1962 essay describing his efforts in color, Adams noted the irony
> of our perceptions about the two media. "There is little or no
> 'reality' in the blacks, grays and whites of either the informational
> or expressive black-and-white image," he wrote, "and yet we have
> learned to interpret these values as meaningful and 'real.'"
>
> Darren Addy
> Kearney, Nebraska

I feel sort of the the same way as you Darren, but not precisely. I
rarely (if ever) see a black and white photograph and think "Ooh, Aah,
that's breathtaking!". I do feel that about color photography very
often. OTOH, I see monochrome images and think they're very nice and I
appreciate the aesthetics and even convert to monochrome occasionally.

So I think I see the 'sheer in your face beauty' in color images,
whereas I feel more contemplative and introspective regarding the
monochrome images I enjoy.

Possibly, because of the influence of television, monochrome images
almost always strike me as older.

I've liked, but never really loved Ansel's work. Not putting it down
in any way. A fair portion of it doesn't strike my fancy, even though
some of it's very good.

Possibly Ansel also felt closest to B&W because that's essentially
what he learned on, grew up on, made his fame on. I would too!  :-)

Tom C.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to