[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>In a message dated 02/03/02 03:34:59 GMT Standard Time, Mark Roberts writes:
>
><< So...it shouldn't be too difficult to modify a K or M lens.
> > With this in mind, I went to Boz's famous K-mount page, downloaded the
> > diagrams of the "A" lens mount with the table that shows which switch contacts 
> > need to be shorted and which insulated in order to give the correct information 
> > for various min and max apertures. Then I made a template from a lens mount 
> > from a junked FA series lens, marked the appropriate spots on a standard "K" 
> > lens mount and set to work with a drill. I drilled about half way through the 
> > metal for each contact spot that needed to be insulated, filled in the resulting 
> > divot with epoxy and, viola! A pseudo A-mount!
> >
> > The only lens I've done this to so far is my K 15/3.5 but it seems to work
> > just as planned. >>
>
>And you did this to a 15mm? ............................................you 
>are a braver man than I.

You overestimate my bravery. Had anything gone wrong I only would have had to
replace the metal flange of the lens mount. Pentax can probably supply them new
(as they still make the A15/3.5 and A20/2.8) but I'm betting buying an old
M50/2.0 on eBay would be cheaper.

>There is a guy named Roland Elliot who puts matrix metering chips "in" Nikon 
>manual focus lenses. Seems like Mark aims to rival or surpass this gent?
> I am incredulous, but not taking the piss.

No need to install a "chip" with the Pentax lens so I'm doing much simpler work
than he. Did you look at the photo I posted? The metering did a nice job in a
tricky situation.

-- 
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to