On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:08:14AM -0700, Larry Colen wrote: > > On Sep 28, 2011, at 10:13 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: > > > Read the review, the camera looks to be better than I had thought, but then > > I hadn't thought too much about it. > > I would be very interested to see comparisons between pictures from the Q, > and pictures from some of Pentax's early APS DSLRs.
Judging by the example pictures in that review, I'd say the Q is significantly better. There are a couple of shots shown taken at ISO 3200 which are much cleaner than anything I could get from my *ist-D (perhaps comparable to what I could achieve at ISO 800). Of course with the D I could put my f/1.4 lens on the front, which gave me a bit more light-gathering capability. There again, though, just that lens alone was probably bulkier and heavier than the Q. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
