standardization doesnt mean only 1 standard.
On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 08:52:10PM -0800, Alan Chan wrote:
> >I TOTALLY disagree. By standardizing on the smaller size of the CCD
> >(not the resolution) the can now proceed to design faster
> >smaller optics with better DOF than by using a 35mm size sensor.
> >As long as the resolution isnt fixed, they can continue to
> >design higher and higher rez cameras using the smae optics.
> >It's a great idea. There is nothing to say that a kmount
> >adapter couldnt be developed either.
>
> But isn't this the arguement used on the evil APS too?
>
> >If high resolution sensors can be developed using a smaller sensor
> >ALL of the optics become smaller, cheaper, lighter, faster. Why
> >would you want to use 35mm format sensor size except to use OLD bulky
> >lenses?
>
> But the question is, how small is small enough? And how small human hands
> can be (to operate the equipments)?
>
> regards,
> Alan Chan
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
