Then isn't the opposite true. Your change isn't constant. At 06:56 AM 2/28/2002 -0600, you wrote: >Well, at least you'll be able to take the digital images to a digital >equivalent of a mini-lab for "processing" and printing, if you don't want to >do it yourself. The only thing constant in life is change. And I keep >getting less of that every time I spend a buck. :-) > >Len >--- > >-----Original Message----- >From: Chris Stoddart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 6:13 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: BBC mention Foveon > > >Now even the BBC is getting in on the Foveon bandwagon. > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1842000/1842673.stm > >I dunno about others, but I'm getting quite twitchy about this with >regards to even the medium-term future of film. Am I alone in not partic >wanting all cameras to go digital? Hell, I have photography as a hobby to >get AWAY from bloody computers! > >Chris >- >- >This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, >go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to >visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
