In a message dated Sat, 2 Mar 2002 3:18:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been thinking a bit about this and realized that, for me, there is > no "best" 35mm camera. When I'm out on the street or elsewhere I and > want to shoot fast, quietly, and thoughtfully, the MX does it best. The > small size and weight, lack of clutter from features and automation, > makes it particularly appealing. > > However, there are times when automated exposure, or the need for a > different finder, or a motor drive or winder, is useful, and then the LX > comes into its own special sphere. As a point of interest, why would you choose the MX over the LX for some situations? I've never owned the MX, so I don't know -- is it *that* much smaller & lighter? And is it quieter? - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
