On 11-10-15 3:16 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:

In view of the recent discussions here, I thought these thoughts
might be of interest to some PDMLers:
http://naturography.com/say-something/

I am not sure if I agree with the claimed universality of the assertion
made by the author. It is rather philosophical - and in some sense a
question of definitions.  What is primary: a beauty or the story, - that
is similar to the chicken-and-egg dilemma.

After all, "the beauty is in the eye of the beholder" and
"all readings [of a book/art/... ] are correct".

Enjoy!

Igor

Firstly, thanks for this link, Igor. I enjoyed reading it even if only to be frustrated a little by it. I know what you mean by the chicken/egg conundrum.

Problems I see with his main point to "add content":

Many, possibly most of my shots are of something interesting or attractive to look at. That's it, the subject is the content. The "meaning", such as it is, is: "I observed this lovely X and I'd like to share my enjoyment of seeing it with you." So how am I supposed to add a "story", "experience", "emotion" above and beyond that? Certainly, I consider how *best* to convey the attractiveness or interestingness of the subject when I shoot it. I consider my PoV, lighting, etc.

He's talking about communication. Pictures communicate, so add content, not just gibberish. But successful communication requires a shared frame of reference between you and the other parties. The more shared FoR you have, the less data has to be transmitted. If I take a shot of my cat and show it to my wife, it's like art to her. If I show that same cat pic to Mike Johnson, it's line noise pffffffffffff. Much of the story, experience, emotion in a shot comes from that share point of reference. That's out-of-band stuff like background reading on a subject.

And it doesn't help that the article's accompanying image doesn't do anything to illustrate his point, at least to me. It's a lovely shot, but that's all it communicates to me: attractive sea lions.

Guess what I'm saying is he's got a point, but it's too complex to cover in that teensy blog posting.

-bmw

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to