People are allowed to make bad decisions, that's what being free is all
about. Hopefully they'll make more good decisions than bad. In this
case the authorities seem to have been a bit trigger happy and the owner
of the animals seems to have been more than a little irresponsible.
On 10/20/2011 12:15 AM, John Francis wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 04:50:38PM -0700, Joseph McAllister wrote:
Chilled me somewhat too. But I understand the parameters under which decisions
had to be made.
The blame lies, in my mind, entirely with the owner,
for not thinking any further out of his mind than his own state.
Well, there's also the viewpoint that it should be necessary to get
a permit (with real, hard-to-answer qualification questions) before
being allowed to house that many wild animals on your property.
I understand that this comes up fair and square against the doctrine
of removing excessive government regulation of private individuals.
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthily search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
