I don't know, I doubt he was thinking that far in advance. He decided
to kill himself but couldn't leave the animals caged. You see that
when unthinking animal rights activists simply release captive animals.
They don't consider what will happen to them once they're released.
On 10/20/2011 1:05 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
I wish it had been possible to recapture the animals, but I understand
why the local law enforcement didn't think they could do that.
I don't like what the local law enforcement did. They didn't think
they had any other choice. All of the choices were bad, so I won't
fault them for making the least bad choice to protect the local people.
All the blame resides with the guy who owned the place. I expect he
intended the animals would be killed, but that they would kill
innocent people first.
From: Joseph McAllister
Chilled me somewhat too. But I understand the parameters under which
decisions had to be made.
The blame lies, in my mind, entirely with the owner, for not thinking
any further out of his mind than his own state.
Sad situation, bad outcome.
On Oct 19, 2011, at 12:17 , John Sessoms wrote:
Really fucked up story:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/20/us/police-kill-dozens-of-animals-freed-from-ohio-preserve.html
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthily search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
