On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:42 PM, John Sessoms <[email protected]> wrote: > From: "Brian Walters" >> >> On Tuesday, November 08, 2011 8:59 PM, "Ed Keeney" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Polaroid going back to its roots (instant prints) but this time it's >>> digital... >>> >>> >>> http://www.extremetech.com/electronics/104163-polaroid-this-time-its-digital >>> >> >> Can't really see this taking off. It's pretty expensive for low >> quality, 3x4-inch prints and with the vast number of smartphones in >> circulation, photo sharing digitally seems more convenient. > > I expect the target market is more seriously into irony than it is into > photography. Should be big with that Andy Warhol wannabee crowd. > I call them "fucking hipsters".
The price is why I never used Polaroids. The packs have always been wicked expensive. > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- David Parsons Photography http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com Aloha Photographer Photoblog http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
