On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 2:44 PM, "Daniel J. Matyola" <[email protected]> wrote: > First, every now and then, when I am voting on images, an image shows > up as a blank page. Clicking on the enlarge button pops up another > window, also blank except for a bar allowing one to scroll back and > forth. Clicking on the EXIF Data button displays the EXIF information > normally. Trying to refresh or reload the window does no good. I > can't get to the next image without voting thumb up or thumb down, > which is hard when I haven't seen the image. It happens once out of > 25 images or so. Has anyone else had this happen?
Occasionally but not as often as that. I quit voting at that stage and come back later. > > Second, on the Artist Dashboard, the images are displayed in the > "Approved in Gallery" section in chronological order but date of > submission, except for the first 6, which are all from June 2011. Mine seem to be in chronological order, starting from the earliest submissions, except that on the second page there are two from June 2011 among the earlier ones. Certainly odd. > In the public Gallery, however, my earliest submission are the last ones > displayed. This bothers me a bit,since those early images are among > the ones I like best, and were approved when the standards seemed to > be higher. Didn't they rotate the images somewhat randomly in the old > gallery? I liked that better. I can't remember how they were presented in the old gallery. The interface was so bloody slow that I rarely checked. I prefer to have the more recent ones displayed first because they are larger and display better (they don't get resized beyond their original size). > > Third, When I first learned the PPG was accepting images again, I > submitted one, on Oct 24, just as a test. Then, I submitted a second > on Oct 25, again more or less as a test to see how it was working. > Later that day, I picked put several more images and submitted them. > All the other images submitted in October have been processed, but > those first two are still "Pending Artist Voting." I am wondering if > the fact that they were submitted singly delayed the process of > submitting them for a vote, or if perhaps there is indeed a two-tiered > selection process, and that this images didn't gain enough votes to be > immediately approved and were therefore submitted to the panel of > "experts." Has anyone else seen certain images review more quickly -- > or a lot more slowly -- that other images submitted at the same time > or later? Yes - certainly some of mine have been reviewed quicker than others. The ones I submitted on Oct 24 have all been processed but a couple took a week or more longer than the others. Cheers Brian ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- -- http://www.fastmail.fm - A fast, anti-spam email service. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
