On 16/11/11, Miserere, discombobulated, unleashed: >I appears Fuji might be trying to prove me wrong, while at the same >time give Pentax the finger by naming the camera "LX". It's not like >we haven't been telling Pentax to release a digital LX for the last 8 >years: > >http://photorumors.com/2011/11/15/fuji-mirrorless-camera-leaked/ > >In all fairness, the "LX" names is being pulled out of someone's rear >end; just because the lenses have "LX" written on their mounts with >permanent marker doesn't mean that's the name of the camera. > >There is one thing about this camera that will make me more inclined >to buy it: It has the lens release button in the right/correct/proper >location (i.e., the same place as Pentax cameras, the only brand who's >got it right). > >So whaddya think, Cotty?
Fuji are slated to release a higher end camera next year, so it's entirely feasible. If I had the money I'd buy an X10 tomorrow. The huge selling point for me is the usable optical viewfinder. Which is funny because I use a very high quality EVF on my video camera every day (actually a small CRT, not LCD) and even though it is superb for focussing and composing, for stills I would have optical every time. So yeah, I would be very interested. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ---------- http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
