Annsan wrote: > Jostein, in your hands a 2mg darkside P&S from the dark ages would > produce yummy images. 3 and , Um, I think 6 are ones I like best > surprised to see the "HDR" - but then you know how to control it > or the camera does.
> gabble appreciated - doesn't look like this camera needs to be > bought, though - (oh yeah, like I'd buy it) That's very nice of you to say, Ann. But those images are more about just being out there and point the camera at something. The camera doesn't deal with the HDR itself. I set it to auto-bracketing, so that it took 3 exposures in a quick series. The computer at home did the rest. I was curious to see how the raw files from the Q held up to the assault by the Photomatix software. In my experience, different cameras produce very different results with this software. No, this camera does not need to be bought by me. :-) Don Guthrie wrote: > Certainly some good examples of the Q's capabilities. Although some > credit goes the photographer because you got all the quality it had. > Whatever its shortcomings everybody in PDML might want one of these if > the price didn't seem so out of line. My ever-carry P&S is a Samsung > with a long zoom which has taken some very nice photos. It cost > $125.00. Thanks for the helpful post. I guess at half the price, Pentax would be hard put to meet the demand. Fingers crossed the price will come down after a while. > Oh and I envy your having snow! Except for 3 days it has been a brown > winter here. Yeah. Even a thin layer of snow makes a big difference, doesn't it. It's like getting an hour extra of daylight. :-) -- http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ http://alunfoto.blogspot.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
